<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?><?xml-stylesheet href="http://www.blogger.com/styles/atom.css" type="text/css"?><feed xmlns='http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom' xmlns:openSearch='http://a9.com/-/spec/opensearchrss/1.0/' xmlns:georss='http://www.georss.org/georss' xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0'><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-15268980</id><updated>2012-02-11T17:54:57.374-07:00</updated><category term='Same-Sex Rights'/><category term='sin tax'/><category term='externality'/><category term='carbon markets'/><category term='COLA'/><category term='market failure'/><category term='Trade'/><category term='fat tax'/><category term='Social Security'/><category term='efficiency'/><title type='text'>Economics and Government</title><subtitle type='html'>This is a CU Colorado Springs student blog for the course Economics of the Public Sector.</subtitle><link rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#feed' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://economics-government.blogspot.com/feeds/posts/default'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/15268980/posts/default?max-results=100'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://economics-government.blogspot.com/'/><link rel='hub' href='http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com/'/><link rel='next' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/15268980/posts/default?start-index=101&amp;max-results=100'/><author><name>Larry Eubanks</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/15566964700226634137</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><generator version='7.00' uri='http://www.blogger.com'>Blogger</generator><openSearch:totalResults>443</openSearch:totalResults><openSearch:startIndex>1</openSearch:startIndex><openSearch:itemsPerPage>100</openSearch:itemsPerPage><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-15268980.post-1467129210257422833</id><published>2010-12-14T21:58:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2010-12-14T21:58:04.395-07:00</updated><title type='text'>Fed Sticks to Bond-Buying Policy</title><summary type='text'>       This article is about the Fed and how they are sticking to buying $600 million in US Treasury Bonds and keeping the interest rates near zero. Even though consumer spending for Christmas has raised significantly this year, unemployment continues to remain around 10%. In addition, Congress is expected to approve a tax cut package for next year. This has not changed the Fed's mind about their</summary><link rel='related' href='http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704694004576019712503334654.html?mod=WSJ_Markets_LEFTTopNews' title='Fed Sticks to Bond-Buying Policy'/><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://economics-government.blogspot.com/feeds/1467129210257422833/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=15268980&amp;postID=1467129210257422833' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/15268980/posts/default/1467129210257422833'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/15268980/posts/default/1467129210257422833'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://economics-government.blogspot.com/2010/12/fed-sticks-to-bond-buying-policy.html' title='Fed Sticks to Bond-Buying Policy'/><author><name>carrie</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='14' height='32' src='http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_SSVmXZHj5X0/TNtqi5j69BI/AAAAAAAAACs/vtplTfxoJxA/S220/carebear.JPG'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-15268980.post-2952170798331217081</id><published>2010-12-01T15:15:00.001-07:00</published><updated>2010-12-01T15:17:54.599-07:00</updated><title type='text'>Unemployment Checks Create Jobs? YEAH RIGHT</title><summary type='text'>Back in June 2010 Nancy Pelosi made a statement that unemployment benefits are the fastest way to create jobs. This statement was made in support of extending the amount of time someone can receive unemployment benefits. The unemployment benefits were extended and now in December we have an even higher unemployment rate then we did back in June and now the extended benefits are expiring again. So</summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://economics-government.blogspot.com/feeds/2952170798331217081/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=15268980&amp;postID=2952170798331217081' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/15268980/posts/default/2952170798331217081'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/15268980/posts/default/2952170798331217081'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://economics-government.blogspot.com/2010/12/unemployment-checks-create-jobs-yeah.html' title='Unemployment Checks Create Jobs? YEAH RIGHT'/><author><name>Patrick Buesing</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-15268980.post-6897368083366835218</id><published>2010-11-30T22:14:00.004-07:00</published><updated>2010-11-30T22:24:06.820-07:00</updated><title type='text'>Tax Cuts to expire</title><summary type='text'>I recently read an article on USnews.com entitled "Why Tax Hikes for the Wealthy are Inevitable" regarding the upcoming expiration of the Bush tax cuts that will soon end for the top income earners. While the articles poses several interesting reasons regarding the expiration of the tax cuts and the effects it will have on the top income earners, it seems as though a greater percentage of the </summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://economics-government.blogspot.com/feeds/6897368083366835218/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=15268980&amp;postID=6897368083366835218' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/15268980/posts/default/6897368083366835218'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/15268980/posts/default/6897368083366835218'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://economics-government.blogspot.com/2010/11/tax-cuts-to-expire.html' title='Tax Cuts to expire'/><author><name>Acypert</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='32' height='21' src='http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_6-LCvjjN4ek/TKVA0tIw2bI/AAAAAAAAAAM/VuO8W62cfLs/S220/DSC_8120m.jpg'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-15268980.post-2522541307409020440</id><published>2010-11-30T19:44:00.003-07:00</published><updated>2010-11-30T20:32:19.655-07:00</updated><title type='text'>No Increase in Unemployment Benefits</title><summary type='text'>Mercury News reports that the US Senate failed to pass an extension of unemployment benefits. They explain that this means that 2 million unemployed people in the US will face losing their benefits. They claim that this will have longterm repercussions for the nation and its economic recovery that is already slow coming. The article claims that this will stunt the already slow economic recovery, </summary><link rel='related' href='http://www.mercurynews.com/business/ci_16745250' title='No Increase in Unemployment Benefits'/><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://economics-government.blogspot.com/feeds/2522541307409020440/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=15268980&amp;postID=2522541307409020440' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/15268980/posts/default/2522541307409020440'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/15268980/posts/default/2522541307409020440'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://economics-government.blogspot.com/2010/11/no-increase-in-unemployment-benefits.html' title='No Increase in Unemployment Benefits'/><author><name>heather.carpenter</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-15268980.post-8138713949128478218</id><published>2010-11-30T18:39:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2010-11-30T18:41:27.656-07:00</updated><title type='text'>Jobless aid loss could choke economic growth</title><summary type='text'>&lt;!--[if gte mso 9]&gt;        &lt;![endif]--&gt;&lt;!--[if gte mso 9]&gt;     Normal   0               false   false   false      EN-US   X-NONE   X-NONE                                                                                                     &lt;![endif]--&gt;&lt;!--[if gte mso 9]&gt;</summary><link rel='related' href='http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/40430391/ns/business-stocks_and_economy/' title='Jobless aid loss could choke economic growth'/><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://economics-government.blogspot.com/feeds/8138713949128478218/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=15268980&amp;postID=8138713949128478218' title='1 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/15268980/posts/default/8138713949128478218'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/15268980/posts/default/8138713949128478218'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://economics-government.blogspot.com/2010/11/jobless-aid-loss-could-choke-economic.html' title='Jobless aid loss could choke economic growth'/><author><name>Jeff</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>1</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-15268980.post-2988315215925934428</id><published>2010-11-30T18:01:00.001-07:00</published><updated>2010-11-30T18:04:52.924-07:00</updated><title type='text'>Federal Pay Freeze: Is this an example of efficiency?</title><summary type='text'>In this article, President Barack Obama has proposed a two year salary freeze on all federal civilian employees’ salaries. This action will require congressional approval, but with heavy Republican support it should pass. President Obama’s salary freeze will affect about two million federal workers and will save $5 billion during the course of the next two years, $28 billion over 5 years and </summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://economics-government.blogspot.com/feeds/2988315215925934428/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=15268980&amp;postID=2988315215925934428' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/15268980/posts/default/2988315215925934428'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/15268980/posts/default/2988315215925934428'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://economics-government.blogspot.com/2010/11/federal-pay-freeze-is-this-example-of.html' title='Federal Pay Freeze: Is this an example of efficiency?'/><author><name>Michael Keck</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-15268980.post-9003642980152116328</id><published>2010-11-30T17:44:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2010-11-30T17:45:08.774-07:00</updated><title type='text'>Ballot Measures</title><summary type='text'>&lt;!--[if gte mso 9]&gt;     Normal   0                         MicrosoftInternetExplorer4   &lt;![endif]--&gt;&lt;!--[if !mso]&gt;  st1\:*{behavior:url(#ieooui) }  &lt;![endif]--&gt;&lt;!--[if gte mso 10]&gt;   /* Style Definitions */  table.MsoNormalTable  {mso-style-name:"Table Normal";  mso-tstyle-rowband-size:0;  mso-tstyle-colband-size:0;  mso-style-noshow:yes;  mso-style-parent:"";  mso-padding-alt:0in 5.4pt 0in 5.4pt</summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://economics-government.blogspot.com/feeds/9003642980152116328/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=15268980&amp;postID=9003642980152116328' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/15268980/posts/default/9003642980152116328'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/15268980/posts/default/9003642980152116328'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://economics-government.blogspot.com/2010/11/ballot-measures.html' title='Ballot Measures'/><author><name>Andrea Perry</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-15268980.post-4445044879917173167</id><published>2010-11-30T17:27:00.002-07:00</published><updated>2010-11-30T18:26:23.219-07:00</updated><title type='text'>Taxes Don't Matter (And Bill Gates can Fly)</title><summary type='text'>Anybody else imagining John Crichton from Farscape shouting out "Taxes don't matter!" in that same voice he used in the episode where he was saying that about crackers? ...No? Just me? Crap. Moving on.  I almost fainted when I read this one particular article in BusinessWeek today. Not because of what the writer said--he was just reporting. No, it's because I actually agreed with a politician. (.</summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://economics-government.blogspot.com/feeds/4445044879917173167/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=15268980&amp;postID=4445044879917173167' title='1 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/15268980/posts/default/4445044879917173167'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/15268980/posts/default/4445044879917173167'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://economics-government.blogspot.com/2010/11/taxes-dont-matter-and-bill-gates-can.html' title='Taxes Don&apos;t Matter (And Bill Gates can Fly)'/><author><name>Elizabeth Chin</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>1</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-15268980.post-5406378901910150330</id><published>2010-11-30T13:49:00.002-07:00</published><updated>2010-11-30T13:53:15.889-07:00</updated><title type='text'>Health Care</title><summary type='text'>Obama putting a quota on output, a firm would have to put out more then what they normally would have to put out in order to max their profit. In forcing health care providers to provide more healthcare, beyond their profit maximizing level is not good for health care providers. This will end up lowering their revenue for health care providers in both the long run and the short run. Health care </summary><link rel='related' href='http://www.medcitynews.com/2010/11/whos-afraid-of-obamacare-morning-read/' title='Health Care'/><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://economics-government.blogspot.com/feeds/5406378901910150330/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=15268980&amp;postID=5406378901910150330' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/15268980/posts/default/5406378901910150330'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/15268980/posts/default/5406378901910150330'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://economics-government.blogspot.com/2010/11/health-care.html' title='Health Care'/><author><name>Rita Revilla</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-15268980.post-6423535863508338853</id><published>2010-11-30T03:32:00.001-07:00</published><updated>2010-11-30T04:04:13.750-07:00</updated><title type='text'>Look, I have a marginally useless skillset!</title><summary type='text'>All of this talk in class and our current national economic situation got me to thinking about something that I have fortunately never had to take advantage of - Unemployment Benefits – what do they do?  Are they a forced redistribution of wealth from employers (and potentially working citizenry) to unemployed workers who have not yet found a job?  Yes, that is without a doubt true.  But why do </summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://economics-government.blogspot.com/feeds/6423535863508338853/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=15268980&amp;postID=6423535863508338853' title='1 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/15268980/posts/default/6423535863508338853'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/15268980/posts/default/6423535863508338853'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://economics-government.blogspot.com/2010/11/look-i-have-marginally-useless-skillset.html' title='Look, I have a marginally useless skillset!'/><author><name>Douglas Loeper</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>1</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-15268980.post-4550807947805348333</id><published>2010-11-29T21:53:00.001-07:00</published><updated>2010-11-29T21:55:03.604-07:00</updated><title type='text'>WikiLeaks</title><summary type='text'>People from all different backgrounds can agree that a fundamental role of government is to protect the lives of its citizens. The protection of individuals through national defense and the use of authority to command obedience to the rule of law creates the foundation of a prosperous society. Without the protection of private property, people will not feel that it is safe to accumulate capital </summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://economics-government.blogspot.com/feeds/4550807947805348333/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=15268980&amp;postID=4550807947805348333' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/15268980/posts/default/4550807947805348333'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/15268980/posts/default/4550807947805348333'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://economics-government.blogspot.com/2010/11/wikileaks.html' title='WikiLeaks'/><author><name>Kristine Swift</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='32' height='25' src='http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-YEeM8VsXuKc/TcYbFx7_jOI/AAAAAAAAAAM/2lwkb4Fy-4I/s1600/2252161517_c883b2d603.jpg'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-15268980.post-2968741186674488697</id><published>2010-11-29T20:47:00.001-07:00</published><updated>2010-11-29T20:54:52.442-07:00</updated><title type='text'>Rebuilding Lives After Bankruptcy</title><summary type='text'>    The option of bankruptcy can be seen as a potential pareto improvement for society. While it is not the best outcome, it has the potential to make a pareto improvement. The gainers will more than compensate the losers. The option to opt out of debt for a consumer will cost less to society than the loss to the company. While the wealth of some companies can amount to billions, individuals do </summary><link rel='related' href='http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748703957804575602742718377682.html?mod=WSJ_economy_LeftTopHighlights' title='Rebuilding Lives After Bankruptcy'/><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://economics-government.blogspot.com/feeds/2968741186674488697/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=15268980&amp;postID=2968741186674488697' title='1 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/15268980/posts/default/2968741186674488697'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/15268980/posts/default/2968741186674488697'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://economics-government.blogspot.com/2010/11/rebuilding-lives-after-bankruptcy.html' title='Rebuilding Lives After Bankruptcy'/><author><name>carrie</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='14' height='32' src='http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_SSVmXZHj5X0/TNtqi5j69BI/AAAAAAAAACs/vtplTfxoJxA/S220/carebear.JPG'/></author><thr:total>1</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-15268980.post-2229296166693121545</id><published>2010-11-29T20:36:00.001-07:00</published><updated>2010-11-29T20:41:26.882-07:00</updated><title type='text'>To raise or not to raise</title><summary type='text'>&lt;!--[if gte mso 9]&gt;     Normal   0               false   false   false      EN-US   X-NONE   X-NONE                                                                                                     &lt;![endif]--&gt;&lt;!--[if gte mso 9]&gt;</summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://economics-government.blogspot.com/feeds/2229296166693121545/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=15268980&amp;postID=2229296166693121545' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/15268980/posts/default/2229296166693121545'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/15268980/posts/default/2229296166693121545'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://economics-government.blogspot.com/2010/11/to-raise-or-not-to-raise.html' title='To raise or not to raise'/><author><name>Jeff B</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-15268980.post-3812034195957464158</id><published>2010-11-29T14:42:00.001-07:00</published><updated>2010-11-29T14:43:49.898-07:00</updated><title type='text'>Taxes, Taxes, and More Taxes</title><summary type='text'>This article, if everything the author writes is true, gives an economic view of the current issue of whether to extend the tax cuts.  The author outlines the three options that congress has; extend the cuts for everyone, let the cuts expire, or only extend the cut for the lower and middle income earners.  In this article the author uses reports of economic analysts to outline the three options. </summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://economics-government.blogspot.com/feeds/3812034195957464158/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=15268980&amp;postID=3812034195957464158' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/15268980/posts/default/3812034195957464158'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/15268980/posts/default/3812034195957464158'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://economics-government.blogspot.com/2010/11/taxes-taxes-and-more-taxes.html' title='Taxes, Taxes, and More Taxes'/><author><name>Jeremy E</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-15268980.post-8524099493318571831</id><published>2010-11-28T13:37:00.003-07:00</published><updated>2010-11-28T14:08:48.169-07:00</updated><title type='text'>Jobs and taxes are they related?</title><summary type='text'>A recent article in the Wall Street Journal written by Louis B. Mendelsohn covers how he believes that tax incentives and tax breaks allow the wealthy to expand their business and therefor create jobs. Mendelsohn would understand this as he is an entrepreneur who in the late 70s began his own software company. According to him lower marginal tax rates as well as tax incentives with research and </summary><link rel='related' href='http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704170404575625162054529940.html?KEYWORDS=tax+cuts' title='Jobs and taxes are they related?'/><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://economics-government.blogspot.com/feeds/8524099493318571831/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=15268980&amp;postID=8524099493318571831' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/15268980/posts/default/8524099493318571831'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/15268980/posts/default/8524099493318571831'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://economics-government.blogspot.com/2010/11/jobs-and-taxes-are-they-related.html' title='Jobs and taxes are they related?'/><author><name>Tyler Kimsey</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='32' height='24' src='http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_Q6Oqmp4RHcU/TH8HIcOnXrI/AAAAAAAAAAU/pwGY39BckmA/S220/HPIM0864.JPG'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-15268980.post-9194196769830914908</id><published>2010-11-19T14:50:00.002-07:00</published><updated>2010-11-19T15:01:45.805-07:00</updated><title type='text'>Is Wealth Chosen?</title><summary type='text'>I understand the basic concept of the saying we have been hearing in class that 'income is earned, wealth is chosen.'  As far as that saying goes, then I guess a good definition (in terms of the saying) is that wealth can be described as potential for future transactions.  That being said, I do think there are some things wrong with this saying.Not everyone has the capacity to choose wealth.  </summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://economics-government.blogspot.com/feeds/9194196769830914908/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=15268980&amp;postID=9194196769830914908' title='1 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/15268980/posts/default/9194196769830914908'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/15268980/posts/default/9194196769830914908'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://economics-government.blogspot.com/2010/11/is-wealth-chosen.html' title='Is Wealth Chosen?'/><author><name>Spencer Baucke</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>1</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-15268980.post-2166077716827297659</id><published>2010-11-08T09:46:00.004-07:00</published><updated>2010-11-08T09:47:05.685-07:00</updated><title type='text'>Take Home Midterm 2</title><summary type='text'>Here is the link for take home midterm 2.</summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://economics-government.blogspot.com/feeds/2166077716827297659/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=15268980&amp;postID=2166077716827297659' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/15268980/posts/default/2166077716827297659'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/15268980/posts/default/2166077716827297659'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://economics-government.blogspot.com/2010/11/take-home-midterm-2.html' title='Take Home Midterm 2'/><author><name>Larry Eubanks</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/15566964700226634137</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-15268980.post-4736527283684061161</id><published>2010-11-07T11:35:00.005-07:00</published><updated>2010-11-07T12:57:05.443-07:00</updated><title type='text'>Tumultuous Times for Entertainment Mediums</title><summary type='text'>As we all know, the midterm elections were held last week. But another interesting political story involved Gov. Schwarzenegger of California, the Entertainment Merchants Association (EMA), and the U.S. Supreme Court. The Chief Justices heard arguments concerning a bill signed into California law in October 2005. This law made it illegal to sell or rent violent video games to persons under the </summary><link rel='related' href='http://www.mediacoalition.org/VSDA-v.-Schwarzenegger-' title='Tumultuous Times for Entertainment Mediums'/><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://economics-government.blogspot.com/feeds/4736527283684061161/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=15268980&amp;postID=4736527283684061161' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/15268980/posts/default/4736527283684061161'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/15268980/posts/default/4736527283684061161'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://economics-government.blogspot.com/2010/11/tumultuous-times-for-entertainment.html' title='Tumultuous Times for Entertainment Mediums'/><author><name>Tim McDonnell</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-15268980.post-2083975923288226870</id><published>2010-11-05T10:08:00.005-06:00</published><updated>2010-11-05T10:40:57.652-06:00</updated><title type='text'>Clean Drinking Water: Need for Gov't Action?</title><summary type='text'>This article describes many of the deaths and disease that have been caused by not having clean drinking water in various parts of the world.  In these parts of the world they do not have access to clean water simply because they countries do not have the resources to build water purifying plants of anything of the sort.  While reading this article I kept wondering if the same problem happened in</summary><link rel='related' href='http://www.cnn.com/2010/OPINION/11/04/hendley.heroes.water/index.html?hpt=T2' title='Clean Drinking Water: Need for Gov&apos;t Action?'/><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://economics-government.blogspot.com/feeds/2083975923288226870/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=15268980&amp;postID=2083975923288226870' title='1 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/15268980/posts/default/2083975923288226870'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/15268980/posts/default/2083975923288226870'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://economics-government.blogspot.com/2010/11/clean-drinking-water-need-for-govt.html' title='Clean Drinking Water: Need for Gov&apos;t Action?'/><author><name>Spencer Baucke</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>1</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-15268980.post-7623153026820949113</id><published>2010-11-03T11:18:00.002-06:00</published><updated>2010-11-03T12:06:50.265-06:00</updated><title type='text'>Amendments 60 &amp; 61</title><summary type='text'>A significant debate right now is the controversy regarding ballost 60 &amp; 61 for the upcoming election. In short, here is a brief rundown of these ballot measures: Amendment 60 proposes to cut property taxes in half by 2020 and expects schools to replace current revenue with state aid; Amendment 61 proposes to disallow state/government borrowing without approval, and puts a 10 year limit on the </summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://economics-government.blogspot.com/feeds/7623153026820949113/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=15268980&amp;postID=7623153026820949113' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/15268980/posts/default/7623153026820949113'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/15268980/posts/default/7623153026820949113'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://economics-government.blogspot.com/2010/11/amendments-60-61.html' title='Amendments 60 &amp; 61'/><author><name>jjbenson</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-15268980.post-7099076538439647326</id><published>2010-11-01T00:00:00.001-06:00</published><updated>2010-11-01T00:00:36.492-06:00</updated><title type='text'>Private accounts for social security?</title><summary type='text'>&lt;!--[if gte mso 9]&gt;     Normal   0               false   false   false      EN-US   X-NONE   X-NONE                                                                                                     &lt;![endif]--&gt;&lt;!--[if gte mso 9]&gt;</summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://economics-government.blogspot.com/feeds/7099076538439647326/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=15268980&amp;postID=7099076538439647326' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/15268980/posts/default/7099076538439647326'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/15268980/posts/default/7099076538439647326'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://economics-government.blogspot.com/2010/11/private-accounts-for-social-security.html' title='Private accounts for social security?'/><author><name>Jeff B</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-15268980.post-8264219303939374929</id><published>2010-10-31T23:44:00.002-06:00</published><updated>2010-10-31T23:54:32.847-06:00</updated><title type='text'>Outback provides employees with flu shot subsidy</title><summary type='text'>I currently work for Outback Steak House. I recently received notice that this year Outback has chosen to pay for over half of the cost of flu shots. All we must do is take our pay stub into Target and pay a small fee of ten dollars, total cost is twenty four, and we will receive this years shots. Surprisingly, there are still many of my fellow co-workers who have chosen to abstain from getting </summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://economics-government.blogspot.com/feeds/8264219303939374929/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=15268980&amp;postID=8264219303939374929' title='2 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/15268980/posts/default/8264219303939374929'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/15268980/posts/default/8264219303939374929'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://economics-government.blogspot.com/2010/10/outback-provides-employees-with-flu.html' title='Outback provides employees with flu shot subsidy'/><author><name>Acypert</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='32' height='21' src='http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_6-LCvjjN4ek/TKVA0tIw2bI/AAAAAAAAAAM/VuO8W62cfLs/S220/DSC_8120m.jpg'/></author><thr:total>2</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-15268980.post-4996771164488673750</id><published>2010-10-31T23:31:00.002-06:00</published><updated>2010-10-31T23:44:04.705-06:00</updated><title type='text'>The Pros and Cons in Privatizing Social Security</title><summary type='text'>There are several concerns as of late regarding the system of social security. Some argue that it is a source of market failure calling it intergenerational injustice, while others argue it is a system that has worked for many years, and wonder what problems we would face if it suddenly changed. There are several positve consequences of privatizing social security. First, it wouls lessen the </summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://economics-government.blogspot.com/feeds/4996771164488673750/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=15268980&amp;postID=4996771164488673750' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/15268980/posts/default/4996771164488673750'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/15268980/posts/default/4996771164488673750'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://economics-government.blogspot.com/2010/10/pros-and-cons-in-privatizing-social.html' title='The Pros and Cons in Privatizing Social Security'/><author><name>Acypert</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='32' height='21' src='http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_6-LCvjjN4ek/TKVA0tIw2bI/AAAAAAAAAAM/VuO8W62cfLs/S220/DSC_8120m.jpg'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-15268980.post-7576073685635714732</id><published>2010-10-31T22:20:00.000-06:00</published><updated>2010-10-31T22:22:09.861-06:00</updated><title type='text'>Social Security, changing the retirement age is a Band-Aid on a gushing artery.</title><summary type='text'>There are several ideas on how to fix social security; one of the more popular ideas right now is increasing the retirement age.   An article in National Underwriter magazine reports that the American Academy of Actuaries has called for the retirement age to be increased. Now, what would this do to social security? It would change the full retirement age at which people start receive their full </summary><link rel='related' href='http://www.lifeandhealthinsurancenews.com/News/2010/10/Pages/Social-Security-AAA-Calls-for-Increase-in-Retirement-Age.aspx?page=1' title='Social Security, changing the retirement age is a Band-Aid on a gushing artery.'/><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://economics-government.blogspot.com/feeds/7576073685635714732/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=15268980&amp;postID=7576073685635714732' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/15268980/posts/default/7576073685635714732'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/15268980/posts/default/7576073685635714732'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://economics-government.blogspot.com/2010/10/social-security-changing-retirement-age.html' title='Social Security, changing the retirement age is a Band-Aid on a gushing artery.'/><author><name>Patrick Buesing</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-15268980.post-1439463056244469943</id><published>2010-10-31T22:09:00.002-06:00</published><updated>2010-10-31T22:12:46.796-06:00</updated><title type='text'>The Pay As You Go System (Paying for Pops)</title><summary type='text'>The Pay As You Go System (Paying for Pops)Depending on one’s vantage point, Social Security is either a pro and/or con.  I believe the social Security program to be the latter.  Social Security is defined as government provided pensions, disability  payments, unemployment compensation and health benefits ( or simply, the income redistribution from the young to the old and from the worker to the </summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://economics-government.blogspot.com/feeds/1439463056244469943/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=15268980&amp;postID=1439463056244469943' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/15268980/posts/default/1439463056244469943'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/15268980/posts/default/1439463056244469943'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://economics-government.blogspot.com/2010/10/pay-as-you-go-system-paying-for-pops.html' title='The Pay As You Go System (Paying for Pops)'/><author><name>Ellis</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-15268980.post-5399679725947930147</id><published>2010-10-31T21:43:00.003-06:00</published><updated>2010-10-31T21:55:40.224-06:00</updated><title type='text'>The US Dollar value: A Negative Externality</title><summary type='text'>Today, the US dollar dropped in value to $1.3972 per euro from 1.3947 a couple of days ago, October 29.  It is currently at 80.35 yen.  I believe this is proof that it is a negative externality within the economy.  Even though the economy is recovering from this recession, the value compared to the euro is dropping at a slow rate.   There are some who believe that this is helping the economy </summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://economics-government.blogspot.com/feeds/5399679725947930147/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=15268980&amp;postID=5399679725947930147' title='1 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/15268980/posts/default/5399679725947930147'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/15268980/posts/default/5399679725947930147'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://economics-government.blogspot.com/2010/10/us-dollar-value-negative-externality.html' title='The US Dollar value: A Negative Externality'/><author><name>Michael Keck</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>1</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-15268980.post-1440869440591975467</id><published>2010-10-31T20:33:00.001-06:00</published><updated>2010-10-31T20:36:39.286-06:00</updated><title type='text'>Local pot growers fear being edged out of market with Prop 19</title><summary type='text'>&lt;!--[if gte mso 9]&gt;     Normal   0               false   false   false      EN-US   X-NONE   X-NONE                                                     MicrosoftInternetExplorer4                                                   &lt;![endif]--&gt;&lt;!--[if gte mso 9]&gt;</summary><link rel='related' href='http://www.santacruzsentinel.com/ci_16475711?source=most_viewed' title='Local pot growers fear being edged out of market with Prop 19'/><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://economics-government.blogspot.com/feeds/1440869440591975467/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=15268980&amp;postID=1440869440591975467' title='1 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/15268980/posts/default/1440869440591975467'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/15268980/posts/default/1440869440591975467'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://economics-government.blogspot.com/2010/10/local-pot-growers-fear-being-edged-out.html' title='Local pot growers fear being edged out of market with Prop 19'/><author><name>Jeff</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>1</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-15268980.post-5814531907903013076</id><published>2010-10-31T20:17:00.000-06:00</published><updated>2010-10-31T20:18:02.055-06:00</updated><title type='text'>The Election and the Department of Education</title><summary type='text'>With the upcoming election quickly approaching candidates around the United States are making a variety of promises. This election tea party favorites are promising to end the department of education. Among those voicing the anti-department of education view are U.S. Senate candidates Rand Paul and Ken Buck. The reason these candidates are seeking to de-fund the bureaucracy is to return the </summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://economics-government.blogspot.com/feeds/5814531907903013076/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=15268980&amp;postID=5814531907903013076' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/15268980/posts/default/5814531907903013076'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/15268980/posts/default/5814531907903013076'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://economics-government.blogspot.com/2010/10/election-and-department-of-education.html' title='The Election and the Department of Education'/><author><name>Kristine Swift</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='32' height='25' src='http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-YEeM8VsXuKc/TcYbFx7_jOI/AAAAAAAAAAM/2lwkb4Fy-4I/s1600/2252161517_c883b2d603.jpg'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-15268980.post-6038987724904164566</id><published>2010-10-31T14:50:00.002-06:00</published><updated>2010-10-31T15:00:35.713-06:00</updated><title type='text'>City Funding</title><summary type='text'>&lt;!--[if gte mso 9]&gt;     Normal   0                         MicrosoftInternetExplorer4   &lt;![endif]--&gt;&lt;!--[if !mso]&gt;  st1\:*{behavior:url(#ieooui) }  &lt;![endif]--&gt;&lt;!--[if gte mso 10]&gt;   /* Style Definitions */  table.MsoNormalTable  {mso-style-name:"Table Normal";  mso-tstyle-rowband-size:0;  mso-tstyle-colband-size:0;  mso-style-noshow:yes;  mso-style-parent:"";  mso-padding-alt:0in 5.4pt 0in 5.4pt</summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://economics-government.blogspot.com/feeds/6038987724904164566/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=15268980&amp;postID=6038987724904164566' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/15268980/posts/default/6038987724904164566'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/15268980/posts/default/6038987724904164566'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://economics-government.blogspot.com/2010/10/city-funding.html' title='City Funding'/><author><name>Andrea Perry</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-15268980.post-2478703483946741500</id><published>2010-10-31T14:08:00.000-06:00</published><updated>2010-10-31T14:10:23.868-06:00</updated><title type='text'>Social Security</title><summary type='text'>The article in the Philadelphia Inquirer discussed Social Security benefits that are provided to the elderly people and how these funds are not enough for them to live off of. Social Security is a Government program that redistributes income from the younger to the older people. In the article the elderly lady named Stephanie Mikalic broke. After all of the expenses she has she still does not </summary><link rel='related' href='http://www.philly.com' title='Social Security'/><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://economics-government.blogspot.com/feeds/2478703483946741500/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=15268980&amp;postID=2478703483946741500' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/15268980/posts/default/2478703483946741500'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/15268980/posts/default/2478703483946741500'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://economics-government.blogspot.com/2010/10/social-security.html' title='Social Security'/><author><name>Rita Revilla</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-15268980.post-8842644068509763912</id><published>2010-10-31T10:15:00.002-06:00</published><updated>2010-10-31T11:59:02.168-06:00</updated><title type='text'>Double Hit on Cigarettes</title><summary type='text'>I don't smoke. I think I tried it once as a teenager and decided when it didn't make me as cool as I was hoping it would I stopped right away. And the ill effects of smoking have long been documented, yet despite this I have several friends and acquaintances who I think are highly intelligent yet still smoke. And that's cool with me, they respect my air space and I respect their right to </summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://economics-government.blogspot.com/feeds/8842644068509763912/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=15268980&amp;postID=8842644068509763912' title='1 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/15268980/posts/default/8842644068509763912'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/15268980/posts/default/8842644068509763912'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://economics-government.blogspot.com/2010/10/double-hit-on-cigarettes.html' title='Double Hit on Cigarettes'/><author><name>Douglas Loeper</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>1</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-15268980.post-6704020422713702915</id><published>2010-10-30T23:12:00.003-06:00</published><updated>2010-10-30T23:47:16.152-06:00</updated><title type='text'>Adding more lanes won't fix I-70 traffic</title><summary type='text'>This article talks about how the issues associated with road maintenance and expansion have taken a back seat in the 2010 election. The article mentions the need repairing and expanding Colorado roads, particularly along I-70, between Denver and the ski resorts. The author explains that there is a need to do something about the traffic, and safety issues associated with that are. He describes a </summary><link rel='related' href='http://coloradoindependent.com/63200/transportation-a-backburner-issue-but-state-roads-bridges-keep-crumbling' title='Adding more lanes won&apos;t fix I-70 traffic'/><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://economics-government.blogspot.com/feeds/6704020422713702915/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=15268980&amp;postID=6704020422713702915' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/15268980/posts/default/6704020422713702915'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/15268980/posts/default/6704020422713702915'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://economics-government.blogspot.com/2010/10/adding-more-lanes-wont-fix-i-70-traffic.html' title='Adding more lanes won&apos;t fix I-70 traffic'/><author><name>heather.carpenter</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-15268980.post-1563657370118837157</id><published>2010-10-29T12:45:00.003-06:00</published><updated>2010-10-29T13:27:00.382-06:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Social Security'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='COLA'/><title type='text'>Social Security: In a fix, or a fix?</title><summary type='text'>A recent article in USA Today covers how for the second year in a row seniors will not receive their COLA (not a type of soda, it stands for cost of living allowance) added to regular Social Security income. The COLA is supposed to account for inflation and the overall increase in the cost of living based on the CPI. This annual adjustment adds to the burden imposed by the program and means that </summary><link rel='related' href='http://www.usatoday.com/money/perfi/columnist/block/2010-10-19-yourmoney19_ST_N.htm' title='Social Security: In a fix, or a fix?'/><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://economics-government.blogspot.com/feeds/1563657370118837157/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=15268980&amp;postID=1563657370118837157' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/15268980/posts/default/1563657370118837157'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/15268980/posts/default/1563657370118837157'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://economics-government.blogspot.com/2010/10/social-security-in-fix-or-fix.html' title='Social Security: In a fix, or a fix?'/><author><name>Tyler Kimsey</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='32' height='24' src='http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_Q6Oqmp4RHcU/TH8HIcOnXrI/AAAAAAAAAAU/pwGY39BckmA/S220/HPIM0864.JPG'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-15268980.post-3534577094290847005</id><published>2010-10-27T12:29:00.002-06:00</published><updated>2010-10-27T12:34:16.598-06:00</updated><title type='text'>Tax credits for education is too much</title><summary type='text'>“White House pushes to extend college tuition credit”This article notes the need for continuing a tax credit for college students.  The credit allows people to receive some money that they paid for in tuition back when they file their taxes.  This is essentially a grant that the government is giving people to go to school.  School is expensive and this helps the payers of the tuition recoup some </summary><link rel='related' href='http://money.cnn.com/' title='Tax credits for education is too much'/><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://economics-government.blogspot.com/feeds/3534577094290847005/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=15268980&amp;postID=3534577094290847005' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/15268980/posts/default/3534577094290847005'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/15268980/posts/default/3534577094290847005'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://economics-government.blogspot.com/2010/10/tax-credits-for-education-is-too-much.html' title='Tax credits for education is too much'/><author><name>Jeremy E</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-15268980.post-2572401394651296474</id><published>2010-10-26T17:49:00.003-06:00</published><updated>2010-10-26T17:57:17.650-06:00</updated><title type='text'>The Real Solution Is: Let All the Old Farts Die (But Shh, You Didn't Hear That)</title><summary type='text'>Everybody's nervous about social security these days, and when you look at the projections, it's no wonder. With citizens panicking and politicians mud-slinging about the national debt and deficit, the last thing anyone wants to hear about is another instance of a government program's monetary obligations exceeding its revenue.  But BusinessWeek columnist Chris Farrell says that Social Security </summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://economics-government.blogspot.com/feeds/2572401394651296474/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=15268980&amp;postID=2572401394651296474' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/15268980/posts/default/2572401394651296474'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/15268980/posts/default/2572401394651296474'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://economics-government.blogspot.com/2010/10/real-solution-is-let-all-old-farts-die.html' title='The Real Solution Is: Let All the Old Farts Die (But Shh, You Didn&apos;t Hear That)'/><author><name>Elizabeth Chin</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-15268980.post-7301430201439067609</id><published>2010-10-25T17:43:00.001-06:00</published><updated>2010-10-25T17:45:10.871-06:00</updated><title type='text'>BP Oil Spill= Government Failure</title><summary type='text'>I agree with the fact that the BP oil spill was not a market failure, but indeed a government failure. Oil drilling was not causing any harm to the community around itself until the machinery actually burst open. Because of this spill, liability rights are taken into account and BP pays for its damages to society. If BP is responsible for providing the right amount of compensation to the fishers </summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://economics-government.blogspot.com/feeds/7301430201439067609/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=15268980&amp;postID=7301430201439067609' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/15268980/posts/default/7301430201439067609'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/15268980/posts/default/7301430201439067609'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://economics-government.blogspot.com/2010/10/bp-oil-spill-government-failure.html' title='BP Oil Spill= Government Failure'/><author><name>carrie</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='14' height='32' src='http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_SSVmXZHj5X0/TNtqi5j69BI/AAAAAAAAACs/vtplTfxoJxA/S220/carebear.JPG'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-15268980.post-6065938949053047943</id><published>2010-10-23T19:18:00.000-06:00</published><updated>2010-10-23T19:18:31.933-06:00</updated><title type='text'>Poverty</title><summary type='text'>"My advice to students and readers is: When you hear us economists wax eloquent on the virtue of greater efficiency — beware!"

This pretty much sums up the entire article. What I received from this article is that  when economists argue towards efficiency, they typically end up making recommendations based on the Kaldor-Hicks model of efficiency. However, ethical considerations also tend to be </summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://economics-government.blogspot.com/feeds/6065938949053047943/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=15268980&amp;postID=6065938949053047943' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/15268980/posts/default/6065938949053047943'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/15268980/posts/default/6065938949053047943'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://economics-government.blogspot.com/2010/10/poverty.html' title='Poverty'/><author><name>carrie</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='14' height='32' src='http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_SSVmXZHj5X0/TNtqi5j69BI/AAAAAAAAACs/vtplTfxoJxA/S220/carebear.JPG'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-15268980.post-2923719877265391309</id><published>2010-10-21T21:15:00.003-06:00</published><updated>2010-10-21T21:40:02.963-06:00</updated><title type='text'>Charity and the Logic of Collective Action</title><summary type='text'>Last week in class someone made a suggestion that government should just let charity take care of giving the poor what they need.  If the objective is to truly provide the needed amount of aide to the poor then charity alone will never be enough.  People in a large group, in this case the wealthy, will tend to assume that other people will do the work.  This free-rider problem is prevalent in </summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://economics-government.blogspot.com/feeds/2923719877265391309/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=15268980&amp;postID=2923719877265391309' title='2 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/15268980/posts/default/2923719877265391309'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/15268980/posts/default/2923719877265391309'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://economics-government.blogspot.com/2010/10/charity-and-logic-of-ca.html' title='Charity and the Logic of Collective Action'/><author><name>Spencer Baucke</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>2</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-15268980.post-1008325621389314615</id><published>2010-10-17T11:46:00.007-06:00</published><updated>2010-10-18T12:51:13.674-06:00</updated><title type='text'>Protection Fees and Public Services: Potential Consequences</title><summary type='text'>A few weeks ago, the Cranick family of Olbion County, TN watched as their house burned to the ground. According to Timothy Cranick, son of Gene Cranick, his burning of trash in the front yard of their home ultimately led to the fire. After the flames had become uncontrollable, Gene Cranick called 911. Eventually, it was revealed to him that the fire department would not be coming out to assist </summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://economics-government.blogspot.com/feeds/1008325621389314615/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=15268980&amp;postID=1008325621389314615' title='1 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/15268980/posts/default/1008325621389314615'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/15268980/posts/default/1008325621389314615'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://economics-government.blogspot.com/2010/10/protection-fees-and-public-services.html' title='Protection Fees and Public Services: Potential Consequences'/><author><name>Tim McDonnell</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>1</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-15268980.post-570720028701186094</id><published>2010-10-03T19:08:00.000-06:00</published><updated>2010-10-03T19:09:55.987-06:00</updated><title type='text'>Take Home Midterm 1</title><summary type='text'>Here is the link for take home midterm 1.</summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://economics-government.blogspot.com/feeds/570720028701186094/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=15268980&amp;postID=570720028701186094' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/15268980/posts/default/570720028701186094'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/15268980/posts/default/570720028701186094'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://economics-government.blogspot.com/2010/10/take-home-midterm-1.html' title='Take Home Midterm 1'/><author><name>Larry Eubanks</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/15566964700226634137</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-15268980.post-7538435840824016757</id><published>2010-09-30T23:57:00.001-06:00</published><updated>2010-09-30T23:57:50.886-06:00</updated><title type='text'>British Medical Association critical of plans to change NHS</title><summary type='text'>&lt;!--[if gte mso 9]&gt;     Normal   0               false   false   false      EN-US   X-NONE   X-NONE                                                     MicrosoftInternetExplorer4                                                   &lt;![endif]--&gt;&lt;!--[if gte mso 9]&gt;</summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://economics-government.blogspot.com/feeds/7538435840824016757/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=15268980&amp;postID=7538435840824016757' title='1 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/15268980/posts/default/7538435840824016757'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/15268980/posts/default/7538435840824016757'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://economics-government.blogspot.com/2010/09/british-medical-association-critical-of.html' title='British Medical Association critical of plans to change NHS'/><author><name>Jeff B</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>1</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-15268980.post-3557419343110815678</id><published>2010-09-30T21:55:00.004-06:00</published><updated>2010-09-30T22:13:04.569-06:00</updated><title type='text'>McDonalds' Health Plan: A Public Good?</title><summary type='text'>The Affordable Health Care Act passed by Congress and signed by the President making it a law in March 2010.  This law holds insurance companies accountable for their unwillingness to provide the customer with health insurance, lowers health care costs, guarantees more choice, as far as what health care plans the consumer wants, and enhances the quality of health care for all Americans.  All </summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://economics-government.blogspot.com/feeds/3557419343110815678/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=15268980&amp;postID=3557419343110815678' title='1 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/15268980/posts/default/3557419343110815678'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/15268980/posts/default/3557419343110815678'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://economics-government.blogspot.com/2010/09/mcdonalds-health-plan-public-good.html' title='McDonalds&apos; Health Plan: A Public Good?'/><author><name>Michael Keck</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>1</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-15268980.post-2668706958728551525</id><published>2010-09-30T21:23:00.001-06:00</published><updated>2010-09-30T21:24:31.724-06:00</updated><title type='text'>Postal Service Denied Rate Hike</title><summary type='text'>&lt;!--[if gte mso 9]&gt;     Normal   0               false   false   false      EN-US   X-NONE   X-NONE                                                     MicrosoftInternetExplorer4                                                   &lt;![endif]--&gt;&lt;!--[if gte mso 9]&gt;</summary><link rel='related' href='http://money.cnn.com/2010/09/30/news/economy/postal_rate_announcement/index.htm?source=cnn_bin&amp;hpt=Sbin' title='Postal Service Denied Rate Hike'/><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://economics-government.blogspot.com/feeds/2668706958728551525/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=15268980&amp;postID=2668706958728551525' title='1 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/15268980/posts/default/2668706958728551525'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/15268980/posts/default/2668706958728551525'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://economics-government.blogspot.com/2010/09/postal-service-denied-rate-hike.html' title='Postal Service Denied Rate Hike'/><author><name>Jeff</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>1</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-15268980.post-5134713566179779366</id><published>2010-09-30T21:22:00.000-06:00</published><updated>2010-09-30T22:34:45.136-06:00</updated><title type='text'>Policy Analysis: The Static vs. The Dynamic</title><summary type='text'>Earlier this year a tax credit incentive ended for homebuyer’s.  The short version was that homebuyer’s both new and old who entered a contract by the end of April and closed the purchase by the end of June would receive a tax credit between $6,500 and $8,000 for the purchase of their home.  This government policy was enacted in 2009 to encourage and stimulate activity in the Real Estate Market </summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://economics-government.blogspot.com/feeds/5134713566179779366/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=15268980&amp;postID=5134713566179779366' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/15268980/posts/default/5134713566179779366'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/15268980/posts/default/5134713566179779366'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://economics-government.blogspot.com/2010/09/policy-analysis-static-vs-dynamic.html' title='Policy Analysis: The Static vs. The Dynamic'/><author><name>Douglas Loeper</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-15268980.post-4099329005048351046</id><published>2010-09-30T19:33:00.002-06:00</published><updated>2010-09-30T19:59:04.443-06:00</updated><title type='text'>Britain is Cautious About Cutting Benefits</title><summary type='text'>There was an article in the New York Times entitled, "Britain is Cautious About Cutting Benefits," released today in regards to Britain's plan to cut subsidies paid to middle and upper class families with children. The government is worried that by cutting these subsidies it will in effect retract the voters of the middle and upper classes. The research provided shows that although the money is </summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://economics-government.blogspot.com/feeds/4099329005048351046/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=15268980&amp;postID=4099329005048351046' title='1 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/15268980/posts/default/4099329005048351046'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/15268980/posts/default/4099329005048351046'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://economics-government.blogspot.com/2010/09/britain-is-cautious-about-cutting.html' title='Britain is Cautious About Cutting Benefits'/><author><name>Acypert</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='32' height='21' src='http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_6-LCvjjN4ek/TKVA0tIw2bI/AAAAAAAAAAM/VuO8W62cfLs/S220/DSC_8120m.jpg'/></author><thr:total>1</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-15268980.post-698152574516677822</id><published>2010-09-30T17:32:00.001-06:00</published><updated>2010-09-30T17:32:46.554-06:00</updated><title type='text'>Colorado Sugar Tax</title><summary type='text'>If you bought a soda in the last few months you might have noticed that it cost a bit more than usual. The reason for this is that Colorado has removed the tax break on items with sugar in them.As we know a government tax is supposed to correct a negative externality and prevent market failure. The sugar tax is not meant to correct or prevent anything and at 2.9% it’s not even enough to correct </summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://economics-government.blogspot.com/feeds/698152574516677822/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=15268980&amp;postID=698152574516677822' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/15268980/posts/default/698152574516677822'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/15268980/posts/default/698152574516677822'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://economics-government.blogspot.com/2010/09/colorado-sugar-tax.html' title='Colorado Sugar Tax'/><author><name>Patrick Buesing</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-15268980.post-1045814754954099254</id><published>2010-09-30T16:43:00.003-06:00</published><updated>2010-09-30T17:06:09.979-06:00</updated><title type='text'>Why AARP is Still Going Strong</title><summary type='text'>I recently discovered that my father 0f all people, was a member of AARP. It never occured to me that my father had reached the age where joing such groups was a possibility. In my class, Power and Prosperity, we have been discussing the logic of collective action. The author, Mancur Olson, prescribes a theory dealing with collective action. He believes that people join groups for two reasons. </summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://economics-government.blogspot.com/feeds/1045814754954099254/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=15268980&amp;postID=1045814754954099254' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/15268980/posts/default/1045814754954099254'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/15268980/posts/default/1045814754954099254'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://economics-government.blogspot.com/2010/09/why-aarp-is-still-going-strong.html' title='Why AARP is Still Going Strong'/><author><name>Acypert</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='32' height='21' src='http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_6-LCvjjN4ek/TKVA0tIw2bI/AAAAAAAAAAM/VuO8W62cfLs/S220/DSC_8120m.jpg'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-15268980.post-4948190572508108393</id><published>2010-09-30T16:17:00.002-06:00</published><updated>2010-09-30T16:34:21.213-06:00</updated><title type='text'>Obama's Health Care</title><summary type='text'>Unless you've been living under a rock, I'm sure you already know that we're about to see some major changes coming soon regarding health care. Although I don't know the details as well as I'd like, I get the big picture.I am not particulary excited for this bill, and I feel like the negatives FAR outweigh the positives. It's one more way the government can have even MORE control of our lives. It</summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://economics-government.blogspot.com/feeds/4948190572508108393/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=15268980&amp;postID=4948190572508108393' title='1 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/15268980/posts/default/4948190572508108393'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/15268980/posts/default/4948190572508108393'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://economics-government.blogspot.com/2010/09/obamas-health-care.html' title='Obama&apos;s Health Care'/><author><name>jjbenson</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>1</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-15268980.post-9053718523524571898</id><published>2010-09-30T16:12:00.003-06:00</published><updated>2010-09-30T16:41:17.249-06:00</updated><title type='text'>Or We Could Just Tax Amalgam</title><summary type='text'>The EPA has decided to being regulating dental pollution. It proposes a rule that will take effect in 2012. The EPA estimates that dental offices contribute 50% of mercury pollution to local water treatment plants, about 3.7 tons world wide. Their solution for regulating this water pollution (according to the article) is to require that all dental offices to install amalgam separators. These </summary><link rel='related' href='http://www.ibtimes.com/articles/66286/20100928/epa-dental-mercury-waste-dental-amalgams-environment.htm' title='Or We Could Just Tax Amalgam'/><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://economics-government.blogspot.com/feeds/9053718523524571898/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=15268980&amp;postID=9053718523524571898' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/15268980/posts/default/9053718523524571898'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/15268980/posts/default/9053718523524571898'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://economics-government.blogspot.com/2010/09/or-we-could-just-tax-amalgam.html' title='Or We Could Just Tax Amalgam'/><author><name>heather.carpenter</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-15268980.post-7501310303830371104</id><published>2010-09-29T21:46:00.000-06:00</published><updated>2010-09-29T21:48:00.050-06:00</updated><title type='text'>"A New Town"</title><summary type='text'>&lt;!--StartFragment--&gt;  According to an Article by William Evans entitled “BP Scores Stimulus Cash”, the oil company has received 308 million dollars of federal grants over years for a “cutting edge” power plant to be constructed on farmland near Tupman California.  The goal of the plant is to foster clean coal technology in the hope to capture carbon dioxide emissions in the fight against global </summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://economics-government.blogspot.com/feeds/7501310303830371104/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=15268980&amp;postID=7501310303830371104' title='1 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/15268980/posts/default/7501310303830371104'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/15268980/posts/default/7501310303830371104'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://economics-government.blogspot.com/2010/09/new-town.html' title='&quot;A New Town&quot;'/><author><name>Ellis</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>1</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-15268980.post-3847345578818760783</id><published>2010-09-29T11:42:00.002-06:00</published><updated>2010-09-29T12:36:09.319-06:00</updated><title type='text'>Oil Spills &amp; Market Failure</title><summary type='text'>You might think that because pollution is the classic example of an externality that the recent oil spill from the BP drilling facility was a negative externality.  However, I find that there are 2 fundamental reasons to conclude that the BP oil spill was not a source of market failure.First, recall that in class we discussed a silly illustration of an accident caused by me driving too fast.  </summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://economics-government.blogspot.com/feeds/3847345578818760783/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=15268980&amp;postID=3847345578818760783' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/15268980/posts/default/3847345578818760783'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/15268980/posts/default/3847345578818760783'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://economics-government.blogspot.com/2010/09/oil-spills-market-failure.html' title='Oil Spills &amp; Market Failure'/><author><name>Larry Eubanks</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/15566964700226634137</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-15268980.post-6578405410122716479</id><published>2010-09-28T20:22:00.003-06:00</published><updated>2010-09-28T21:09:14.583-06:00</updated><title type='text'>Subsidizing Renewable Energy</title><summary type='text'>The discussion over renewable energy resources has been at the forefront of our political discourse for what seems like a lifetime now. Specifically, since the Carter Administration's brush with catastrophe in the form of gasoline rationing in the 70's, there has been a concern with the fossil fuel-based necessity to modern life. But how do issues surrounding the many concerns over energy sources</summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://economics-government.blogspot.com/feeds/6578405410122716479/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=15268980&amp;postID=6578405410122716479' title='2 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/15268980/posts/default/6578405410122716479'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/15268980/posts/default/6578405410122716479'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://economics-government.blogspot.com/2010/09/subsidizing-renewable-energy.html' title='Subsidizing Renewable Energy'/><author><name>Tim McDonnell</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>2</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-15268980.post-5473504540247667856</id><published>2010-09-28T13:33:00.002-06:00</published><updated>2010-09-28T13:35:53.584-06:00</updated><title type='text'>Efficiency and Liberty as Value Judgements</title><summary type='text'>According to Lord Acton “Liberty is the highest political end of man” if it is true that liberty is a constant goal of all political action then perhaps liberty and not efficiency should be the guiding principle of public finance. After all, economics and politics are intertwined to the point where for years people studied political economy rather than economics. It is impossible to value equally</summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://economics-government.blogspot.com/feeds/5473504540247667856/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=15268980&amp;postID=5473504540247667856' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/15268980/posts/default/5473504540247667856'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/15268980/posts/default/5473504540247667856'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://economics-government.blogspot.com/2010/09/efficiency-and-liberty-as-value.html' title='Efficiency and Liberty as Value Judgements'/><author><name>Kristine Swift</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='32' height='25' src='http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-YEeM8VsXuKc/TcYbFx7_jOI/AAAAAAAAAAM/2lwkb4Fy-4I/s1600/2252161517_c883b2d603.jpg'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-15268980.post-1069816417152817793</id><published>2010-09-28T11:55:00.001-06:00</published><updated>2010-09-28T11:55:28.524-06:00</updated><title type='text'>Break rooms</title><summary type='text'>I would like to examine what exactly happens in the employee break rooms? In dealing with the employee break rooms you are faced with externality issues, marginal cost, total cost.  Marginal cost is the polluter of the break rooms. External cost will continue to increase due to the amount of pollution in the break room. As the employees use the break rooms there will be one person cleaning will </summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://economics-government.blogspot.com/feeds/1069816417152817793/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=15268980&amp;postID=1069816417152817793' title='1 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/15268980/posts/default/1069816417152817793'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/15268980/posts/default/1069816417152817793'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://economics-government.blogspot.com/2010/09/break-rooms.html' title='Break rooms'/><author><name>Rita Revilla</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>1</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-15268980.post-8416440285085925803</id><published>2010-09-27T11:53:00.000-06:00</published><updated>2010-09-27T11:55:54.306-06:00</updated><title type='text'>New Bill, Where is the Market failure?</title><summary type='text'>An article titled “Democrats’ tax bill targets outsourced jobs,” discusses tax cuts and removing some taxes on businesses that remove jobs from the United States.  According to the article, the bill would cut “favorable tax rates” for businesses that outsource jobs to other countries and give tax incentives to companies that create jobs for a U.S. employee that is replacing a foreign worker in </summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://economics-government.blogspot.com/feeds/8416440285085925803/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=15268980&amp;postID=8416440285085925803' title='1 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/15268980/posts/default/8416440285085925803'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/15268980/posts/default/8416440285085925803'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://economics-government.blogspot.com/2010/09/new-bill-where-is-market-failure.html' title='New Bill, Where is the Market failure?'/><author><name>Jeremy E</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>1</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-15268980.post-6948225499198281298</id><published>2010-09-26T13:27:00.002-06:00</published><updated>2010-09-26T13:34:37.319-06:00</updated><title type='text'>The Market Failure of Offshore Drilling (a.k.a. the BP Oil Spill)</title><summary type='text'>&lt;!--[if gte mso 9]&gt;     Normal   0                         MicrosoftInternetExplorer4   &lt;![endif]--&gt;&lt;!--[if !mso]&gt;  st1\:*{behavior:url(#ieooui) }  &lt;![endif]--&gt;&lt;!--[if gte mso 10]&gt;   /* Style Definitions */  table.MsoNormalTable  {mso-style-name:"Table Normal";  mso-tstyle-rowband-size:0;  mso-tstyle-colband-size:0;  mso-style-noshow:yes;  mso-style-parent:"";  mso-padding-alt:0in 5.4pt 0in 5.4pt</summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://economics-government.blogspot.com/feeds/6948225499198281298/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=15268980&amp;postID=6948225499198281298' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/15268980/posts/default/6948225499198281298'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/15268980/posts/default/6948225499198281298'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://economics-government.blogspot.com/2010/09/market-failure-of-offshore-drilling-aka.html' title='The Market Failure of Offshore Drilling (a.k.a. the BP Oil Spill)'/><author><name>Andrea Perry</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-15268980.post-5068839637122536782</id><published>2010-09-24T16:02:00.003-06:00</published><updated>2010-11-30T18:19:59.480-07:00</updated><title type='text'>Regulating the Banks: There's an Externality, Right? ...Right?</title><summary type='text'>The way I see it, there are two reasons usually used to justify government regulation: morality and economics. Oftentimes, the economic argument is used just because it's harder for most people to dispute an "economic fact" than someone else's ideology. But when it comes to Wall Street, well, it's obvious that the reasons are going to be economic.  Right?  Earlier this month, U.S. News &amp; World </summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://economics-government.blogspot.com/feeds/5068839637122536782/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=15268980&amp;postID=5068839637122536782' title='1 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/15268980/posts/default/5068839637122536782'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/15268980/posts/default/5068839637122536782'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://economics-government.blogspot.com/2010/09/regulating-banks-theres-externality.html' title='Regulating the Banks: There&apos;s an Externality, Right? ...Right?'/><author><name>Elizabeth Chin</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>1</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-15268980.post-2020965729688318912</id><published>2010-09-24T15:11:00.004-06:00</published><updated>2010-09-24T15:54:04.812-06:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='carbon markets'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='efficiency'/><title type='text'>Efficiency in a Carbon Market</title><summary type='text'>The U.N. has set up a market to regulate the production of  greenhouse gases using cap and trade. The Clean Development Mechanism is a policy that focuses on reducing greenhouse gases. Also in developing countries that produce HCFC-22 as well as HFC- 23, two chemicals that developed countries have been banned from producing but developing countries can produce until 2030. As well those companies </summary><link rel='related' href='http://www.economist.com/node/16944921?story_id=16944921&amp;CFID=143959730&amp;CFTOKEN=88118009' title='Efficiency in a Carbon Market'/><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://economics-government.blogspot.com/feeds/2020965729688318912/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=15268980&amp;postID=2020965729688318912' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/15268980/posts/default/2020965729688318912'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/15268980/posts/default/2020965729688318912'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://economics-government.blogspot.com/2010/09/efficiency-in-carbon-market.html' title='Efficiency in a Carbon Market'/><author><name>Tyler Kimsey</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='32' height='24' src='http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_Q6Oqmp4RHcU/TH8HIcOnXrI/AAAAAAAAAAU/pwGY39BckmA/S220/HPIM0864.JPG'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-15268980.post-1735400212941008384</id><published>2010-09-23T09:22:00.005-06:00</published><updated>2010-09-23T14:26:49.784-06:00</updated><title type='text'>ObamaCare and its Constitutionality</title><summary type='text'>Before I start into my analysis of this article, I want to make a disclaimer that I am not trying to make a political statement or trying to bash the Obama administration.  I am simply trying to gain an economic understanding of what is occurring in our nation's government.If you haven't heard about the new health care plan that was passed by Congress not too long ago, the basic concept is that </summary><link rel='related' href='http://online.wsj.com/article/NA_WSJ_PUB:SB10001424052748703467304575383702986874016.html' title='ObamaCare and its Constitutionality'/><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://economics-government.blogspot.com/feeds/1735400212941008384/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=15268980&amp;postID=1735400212941008384' title='1 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/15268980/posts/default/1735400212941008384'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/15268980/posts/default/1735400212941008384'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://economics-government.blogspot.com/2010/09/obamacare-and-its-constitutionality.html' title='ObamaCare and its Constitutionality'/><author><name>Spencer Baucke</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>1</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-15268980.post-2942275975292408294</id><published>2010-09-16T16:20:00.003-06:00</published><updated>2010-09-16T16:38:39.244-06:00</updated><title type='text'>Gov't Bank Aide</title><summary type='text'>This new legislation will give $30 billion dollars to community banks in order for them to offer loans to small businesses.  According to the things we've learned in class, gov't has a place in the market when there is a market failure.  The three sources of market failure that we have learned are 1) monopoly 2) externality 3) public good.  So should this bill be passed into law considering the </summary><link rel='related' href='http://www.marketwatch.com/story/senate-approves-small-business-aid-bill-2010-09-16' title='Gov&apos;t Bank Aide'/><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://economics-government.blogspot.com/feeds/2942275975292408294/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=15268980&amp;postID=2942275975292408294' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/15268980/posts/default/2942275975292408294'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/15268980/posts/default/2942275975292408294'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://economics-government.blogspot.com/2010/09/govt-bank-aide.html' title='Gov&apos;t Bank Aide'/><author><name>Spencer Baucke</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-15268980.post-1170267172089717152</id><published>2010-08-27T09:32:00.002-06:00</published><updated>2010-09-02T10:04:44.786-06:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='market failure'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='efficiency'/><title type='text'>Beware Efficiency</title><summary type='text'>Here is another economist, UWE E. REINHARDT, on efficiency.  The Kaldor-Hicks criterion he writes about is like the idea of a "pareto improvement" we discussed in class.  We will specifically use the Kaldor-Hicks criterion as the normative basis for our discussion of benefit-cost analysis.  Please add comments or questions after reading his short essay.</summary><link rel='related' href='http://economix.blogs.nytimes.com/2010/08/27/when-value-judgments-masquerade-as-science/' title='Beware Efficiency'/><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://economics-government.blogspot.com/feeds/1170267172089717152/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=15268980&amp;postID=1170267172089717152' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/15268980/posts/default/1170267172089717152'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/15268980/posts/default/1170267172089717152'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://economics-government.blogspot.com/2010/08/beware-efficiency.html' title='Beware Efficiency'/><author><name>Larry Eubanks</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/15566964700226634137</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-15268980.post-948720199670391983</id><published>2009-05-18T12:50:00.003-06:00</published><updated>2009-05-18T13:07:24.778-06:00</updated><title type='text'>Russian Dachas and American Credit</title><summary type='text'>Sixteen years ago while living in St. Petersburg, Russia I remember having a discussion with a good friend of mine regarding the extreme complexities of securing a home loan through the Russian banking system.  She had been building a tiny home just outside the city for over four years at the time that I met her, and she planned on working for at least two or three more years before she would </summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://economics-government.blogspot.com/feeds/948720199670391983/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=15268980&amp;postID=948720199670391983' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/15268980/posts/default/948720199670391983'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/15268980/posts/default/948720199670391983'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://economics-government.blogspot.com/2009/05/russian-dachas-and-american-credit.html' title='Russian Dachas and American Credit'/><author><name>Shay Callahan</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-15268980.post-3786621699128710242</id><published>2009-05-17T20:56:00.003-06:00</published><updated>2009-05-17T21:21:55.406-06:00</updated><title type='text'></title><summary type='text'>While I also agree that home schooline and private schools offer many benefits, I think that there are certain failings of both systems.  My biggest concern in this regard is the restriction, and sometimes the nearly complete lack of, social interaction.  In the public school system you must not only learn to interact with a wider variety of people, you also must compete with the the other </summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://economics-government.blogspot.com/feeds/3786621699128710242/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=15268980&amp;postID=3786621699128710242' title='2 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/15268980/posts/default/3786621699128710242'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/15268980/posts/default/3786621699128710242'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://economics-government.blogspot.com/2009/05/while-i-also-agree-that-home-schooline.html' title=''/><author><name>stephan</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>2</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-15268980.post-1975172613523656492</id><published>2009-05-16T12:09:00.004-06:00</published><updated>2009-05-17T18:49:23.473-06:00</updated><title type='text'>Education Reform</title><summary type='text'>Having been home schooled for the first 4 years of my education, then private school for another 4, I received an elementary education that was above average. Extensive reading was not only encouraged, but required and mastery of the concepts was graded and rewarded. We worked on a self motivated goal setting system in which I did as much or as little as I pleased and if I advanced beyond the </summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://economics-government.blogspot.com/feeds/1975172613523656492/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=15268980&amp;postID=1975172613523656492' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/15268980/posts/default/1975172613523656492'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/15268980/posts/default/1975172613523656492'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://economics-government.blogspot.com/2009/05/education-reform.html' title='Education Reform'/><author><name>Annette Mullen</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-15268980.post-971215980019596947</id><published>2009-05-15T21:17:00.002-06:00</published><updated>2009-05-15T21:25:40.555-06:00</updated><title type='text'>Par le vous Francais?</title><summary type='text'>While doing research for our final paper in this class, I came across a you tube video that the Cato institute had posted.    Apparently our fearless leader, President Obama, has been vacationing in France ( yes, you did pay for this).   Upon returning to our country, he spoke about how wonderful the country is and how delightful his time was and then he proceeded to speak about their wonderful </summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://economics-government.blogspot.com/feeds/971215980019596947/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=15268980&amp;postID=971215980019596947' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/15268980/posts/default/971215980019596947'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/15268980/posts/default/971215980019596947'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://economics-government.blogspot.com/2009/05/par-le-vous-francais.html' title='Par le vous Francais?'/><author><name>Annette Mullen</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-15268980.post-1883591928273645650</id><published>2009-05-02T10:17:00.002-06:00</published><updated>2009-05-02T10:26:30.398-06:00</updated><title type='text'>Death of the 111th Filibuster--A Dark Specter Ahead</title><summary type='text'>With Senator Specter's transfer to the Democratic party, Nancy Pelosi and Harry Reid effectively face no opposition to their plans. None whatsoever. This has several possible effects, some good, others not.First, not only will Congressional Democrats be able to pass on runaway spending programs with their President in power--just as the Republicans did 8 years ago--they also will be able to do it</summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://economics-government.blogspot.com/feeds/1883591928273645650/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=15268980&amp;postID=1883591928273645650' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/15268980/posts/default/1883591928273645650'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/15268980/posts/default/1883591928273645650'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://economics-government.blogspot.com/2009/05/death-of-111th-filibuster-dark-specter.html' title='Death of the 111th Filibuster--A Dark Specter Ahead'/><author><name>Tim Canon</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-15268980.post-3721843219618824580</id><published>2009-05-01T21:45:00.000-06:00</published><updated>2009-05-01T21:49:12.163-06:00</updated><title type='text'>More on global warming</title><summary type='text'>After writing the last policy analysis on global warming am still confused weather I should pick neither carbon tax nor cap-and-trade. I understand that we should keep our city clean to reduce pollution. An article in The Associated Press on April 24, mentions that electricity providers warn plan would raise prices if the Congress passes a global warning bill without giving utilities some </summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://economics-government.blogspot.com/feeds/3721843219618824580/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=15268980&amp;postID=3721843219618824580' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/15268980/posts/default/3721843219618824580'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/15268980/posts/default/3721843219618824580'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://economics-government.blogspot.com/2009/05/more-on-global-warming.html' title='More on global warming'/><author><name>halina truong</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-15268980.post-8340141969005504690</id><published>2009-05-01T15:57:00.003-06:00</published><updated>2009-05-01T16:09:55.765-06:00</updated><title type='text'>Farm Aid is not only a Concert</title><summary type='text'>The United States government continues to provide farm subsidies to our farming industry.  This continues in a country that possesses ample/fertile land, clean water and world leading farming technology.  The United States spent over $20 billion on farm subsidies in 2008.  This transfer of taxpayers income to a thriving, self-sufficient industry has got to stop. A common misconception is that </summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://economics-government.blogspot.com/feeds/8340141969005504690/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=15268980&amp;postID=8340141969005504690' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/15268980/posts/default/8340141969005504690'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/15268980/posts/default/8340141969005504690'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://economics-government.blogspot.com/2009/05/farm-aid-is-not-only-concert.html' title='Farm Aid is not only a Concert'/><author><name>Chris Peacock</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-15268980.post-2369899587985381999</id><published>2009-04-30T21:18:00.003-06:00</published><updated>2009-04-30T21:45:24.400-06:00</updated><title type='text'>we are thrilled to have you</title><summary type='text'>Perhaps the name of our econ 421 class should be changed to the "economics of politics". Granted, we as a class have decided that not too many politicians adhere to economic principles when making political decisions. The big button issue in politics right now is the switching of political parties by senator, Aries Specter. Where do his loyalties lie? With the people with whom he was elected to </summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://economics-government.blogspot.com/feeds/2369899587985381999/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=15268980&amp;postID=2369899587985381999' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/15268980/posts/default/2369899587985381999'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/15268980/posts/default/2369899587985381999'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://economics-government.blogspot.com/2009/04/we-are-thrilled-to-have-you.html' title='we are thrilled to have you'/><author><name>Danielle Scott</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='33' height='26' src='http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_E4yhFJ-qn34/SXjSRp-m5gI/AAAAAAAAAAM/N7lImzZcaOY/S220/Smile.jpg'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-15268980.post-5264607443863922905</id><published>2009-04-30T21:06:00.044-06:00</published><updated>2009-05-07T11:54:34.349-06:00</updated><title type='text'>Clearing The Winter Roads</title><summary type='text'>After discussing in class about Global Warming, and hearing repetitively about the use of salt in NY last year, I thought this would be a good blogto write about. Unlike Global warming, there is more evidence of harm because of the associated costs for DOT ( Departments of Transportation) and taxpayers, which are monopolies.Image- Penndot Warehouse of SaltMorton Salt and Cargill Incorporated are </summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://economics-government.blogspot.com/feeds/5264607443863922905/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=15268980&amp;postID=5264607443863922905' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/15268980/posts/default/5264607443863922905'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/15268980/posts/default/5264607443863922905'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://economics-government.blogspot.com/2009/04/clearing-winter-roads.html' title='Clearing The Winter Roads'/><author><name>NOT TODAY</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='32' height='24' src='http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-mrA62NEAWQk/Tqy-ybp350I/AAAAAAAAADU/ugktNZGPF2s/s220/DSC00524.JPG'/></author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media='http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/' url='http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_NbFKQZG8BXU/SfzecbR6PgI/AAAAAAAAAB4/fXxOPddcsTU/s72-c/3867692_420x300_mb_art_R0.jpg' height='72' width='72'/><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-15268980.post-6511337104389345357</id><published>2009-04-30T20:27:00.002-06:00</published><updated>2009-04-30T20:35:49.532-06:00</updated><title type='text'>Patriotism and the Common Good</title><summary type='text'>Chrysler announced plans to file for bankruptcy today only four months after receiving $18 billion in bailout funds.  The original auto bailout was sold to the public as a way to save us from the inevitable crippling blow to our economy that would lead to millions of lost jobs.  The White House must sincerely believe that the American public is stricken with the same form of short-term memory </summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://economics-government.blogspot.com/feeds/6511337104389345357/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=15268980&amp;postID=6511337104389345357' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/15268980/posts/default/6511337104389345357'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/15268980/posts/default/6511337104389345357'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://economics-government.blogspot.com/2009/04/patriotism-and-common-good.html' title='Patriotism and the Common Good'/><author><name>Shay Callahan</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-15268980.post-6720229878113627608</id><published>2009-04-30T19:21:00.003-06:00</published><updated>2009-04-30T19:39:14.862-06:00</updated><title type='text'>Oversea profits</title><summary type='text'>Article from, April 22nd, The Wall Street JournalUnder current law, U.S companies can defer taxes indefinitely on the profits they have earned overseas until that money is repatriated back into the country. The Obama administration has proposed changing this law,making off shore profits taxable. The affect of the law would be that congress now has the power to tax outside of the U.S borders. Last</summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://economics-government.blogspot.com/feeds/6720229878113627608/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=15268980&amp;postID=6720229878113627608' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/15268980/posts/default/6720229878113627608'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/15268980/posts/default/6720229878113627608'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://economics-government.blogspot.com/2009/04/oversea-profits.html' title='Oversea profits'/><author><name>Russell Harward</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-15268980.post-1086158133692516175</id><published>2009-04-30T17:25:00.002-06:00</published><updated>2009-04-30T17:42:54.250-06:00</updated><title type='text'>Global Warming and Rational Irrationality</title><summary type='text'>I have been thinking about some of the things that we have been talking about in class, such as rational irrationality, rational ignorance, and global warming. One thing that struck me today was how these subjects are related and how because of our irrationality and ignorance, we all end up kind of confused and it results in bad policy. The main aspect of it all that hit me the most was not how </summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://economics-government.blogspot.com/feeds/1086158133692516175/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=15268980&amp;postID=1086158133692516175' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/15268980/posts/default/1086158133692516175'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/15268980/posts/default/1086158133692516175'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://economics-government.blogspot.com/2009/04/global-warming-and-rational.html' title='Global Warming and Rational Irrationality'/><author><name>Benjamin Massey</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-15268980.post-5251502386059343825</id><published>2009-04-20T19:25:00.001-06:00</published><updated>2009-04-20T19:33:58.828-06:00</updated><title type='text'>What does that have to do with taxes!?!</title><summary type='text'>April 15th is a day dreaded by Americans.  A friend of mine and her husband were shocked to find they owned nearly seven thousand dollars in state and federal taxes this year.  But this year was a little different, across America, TEA (Taxed Enough Already) parties were held on tax day.  A gentleman on one of the Sunday morning shows stated it was just an anti-Obama protest.  ABC ran a story </summary><link rel='related' href='http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y6xWGvdRQ9Q' title='What does that have to do with taxes!?!'/><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://economics-government.blogspot.com/feeds/5251502386059343825/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=15268980&amp;postID=5251502386059343825' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/15268980/posts/default/5251502386059343825'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/15268980/posts/default/5251502386059343825'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://economics-government.blogspot.com/2009/04/what-does-that-have-to-do-with-taxes.html' title='What does that have to do with taxes!?!'/><author><name>Mary Haggen</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-15268980.post-748905118381562557</id><published>2009-04-01T17:31:00.001-06:00</published><updated>2009-04-01T17:31:46.676-06:00</updated><title type='text'>Colorado Springs unemployment rise up to 8.1%</title><summary type='text'>Since the beginning of February the unemployment rate in the Colorado Springs area jump up to 8.1% from 7.7%. Our last policy analysis is on low wage subsidy, many company cannot afforded to hired people, even though, they think about cutting hours for everyone so at least they still in a working force but it not possible because of no profit. The local payrolls are declining to 2.8%. According </summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://economics-government.blogspot.com/feeds/748905118381562557/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=15268980&amp;postID=748905118381562557' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/15268980/posts/default/748905118381562557'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/15268980/posts/default/748905118381562557'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://economics-government.blogspot.com/2009/04/colorado-springs-unemployment-rise-up.html' title='Colorado Springs unemployment rise up to 8.1%'/><author><name>halina truong</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-15268980.post-7161610036487504715</id><published>2009-03-31T23:21:00.003-06:00</published><updated>2009-03-31T23:56:00.594-06:00</updated><title type='text'></title><summary type='text'>Blogging, one of the least time consuming and most fulfilling assignments of any economics class i have ever taken. Although I  generally tend to wait to the last minute to complete this task, it is in those few crucial minutes before midnight that i come across the best news articles to blog about. CNN. com posted a commentary  by Ruben Navarrette out of San Diego titled "Obama is flunking </summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://economics-government.blogspot.com/feeds/7161610036487504715/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=15268980&amp;postID=7161610036487504715' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/15268980/posts/default/7161610036487504715'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/15268980/posts/default/7161610036487504715'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://economics-government.blogspot.com/2009/03/blogging-one-of-least-time-consuming.html' title=''/><author><name>Danielle Scott</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='33' height='26' src='http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_E4yhFJ-qn34/SXjSRp-m5gI/AAAAAAAAAAM/N7lImzZcaOY/S220/Smile.jpg'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-15268980.post-9181756400835264294</id><published>2009-03-31T22:40:00.003-06:00</published><updated>2009-03-31T23:11:21.224-06:00</updated><title type='text'>government role and the bailout</title><summary type='text'>http://www.johnhartstudios.com/wizardofid/2009/03/sunday-march-29-2009.phpI came across this comic strip last Sunday, and I thought that it was a sadly accurate depiction of the current bailout situation. It just seems so backwards that the mistakes of the big players are rewarded while the hard work of the small is ignored. While I recognize proponents argument that those who have been bailed </summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://economics-government.blogspot.com/feeds/9181756400835264294/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=15268980&amp;postID=9181756400835264294' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/15268980/posts/default/9181756400835264294'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/15268980/posts/default/9181756400835264294'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://economics-government.blogspot.com/2009/03/government-role-and-bailout.html' title='government role and the bailout'/><author><name>Benjamin Massey</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-15268980.post-8546203369001211471</id><published>2009-03-31T15:19:00.004-06:00</published><updated>2009-04-03T09:35:35.027-06:00</updated><title type='text'>Public Anger and the AIG Bonuses Scandal</title><summary type='text'>Not too long ago, I wrote a column explaining why the Obama administration's desire to implement salary caps for executives effectively amounts to a form of government extortion. What is basically happening is that the government is dangling carrots in front of these companies--which they are almost obligated by their stockholders to take--and then forcing them to work contracts a certain way. I </summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://economics-government.blogspot.com/feeds/8546203369001211471/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=15268980&amp;postID=8546203369001211471' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/15268980/posts/default/8546203369001211471'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/15268980/posts/default/8546203369001211471'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://economics-government.blogspot.com/2009/03/public-anger-and-aig-bonuses-scandal.html' title='Public Anger and the AIG Bonuses Scandal'/><author><name>Tim Canon</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-15268980.post-7959218659834822636</id><published>2009-03-30T15:28:00.008-06:00</published><updated>2009-03-30T16:46:27.670-06:00</updated><title type='text'>1A--From a Wagnerian Perspective</title><summary type='text'>Local ballot issue 1A has generated a lot of heat in recent weeks. And when I say "heat", I mean as much heat as a couple developers, a few local politicians and one inconspicuous university chancellor can muster on the side of their very busy lives. Given its relevance to public sector economics, I figure it would be interesting to look at it from a Wagnerian Perspective.Richard Wagner suggested</summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://economics-government.blogspot.com/feeds/7959218659834822636/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=15268980&amp;postID=7959218659834822636' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/15268980/posts/default/7959218659834822636'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/15268980/posts/default/7959218659834822636'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://economics-government.blogspot.com/2009/03/1a-from-wagnerian-perspective.html' title='1A--From a Wagnerian Perspective'/><author><name>Tim Canon</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-15268980.post-8000932670513270597</id><published>2009-03-30T13:08:00.002-06:00</published><updated>2009-03-30T13:47:33.007-06:00</updated><title type='text'>Incentives to Business - Thoughts on ballot issue 1A</title><summary type='text'>As a voter (and) a rational individual it appears that Ballot Issue 1A is an open pocket-book for the City of Colorado Springs government. The ballot issue proposes that tax monies be put aside for Economic Development. My first concern is that proponents of this issue state it will not be an increase to taxpayer, rather a "continuation" of an existing tax used on the development of Powers </summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://economics-government.blogspot.com/feeds/8000932670513270597/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=15268980&amp;postID=8000932670513270597' title='2 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/15268980/posts/default/8000932670513270597'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/15268980/posts/default/8000932670513270597'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://economics-government.blogspot.com/2009/03/incentives-to-business-thoughts-on.html' title='Incentives to Business - Thoughts on ballot issue 1A'/><author><name>Chris Peacock</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>2</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-15268980.post-886389517386421053</id><published>2009-03-29T14:26:00.006-06:00</published><updated>2009-03-29T14:33:21.326-06:00</updated><title type='text'>"The fundamentals of our economy are strong."</title><summary type='text'>During the race for president last fall McCain said, “The fundamentals of our economy are strong.”  Obama blasted McCain by telling the people the McCain did not get it.  That he was out of touch with the typical American.  Obama is a master at saying what the people what to hear without really saying anything.  Two week ago, Obama’s people went on Sunday morning shows and said “The fundamentals </summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://economics-government.blogspot.com/feeds/886389517386421053/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=15268980&amp;postID=886389517386421053' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/15268980/posts/default/886389517386421053'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/15268980/posts/default/886389517386421053'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://economics-government.blogspot.com/2009/03/fundamentals-of-our-economy-are-strong.html' title='&quot;The fundamentals of our economy are strong.&quot;'/><author><name>Mary Haggen</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-15268980.post-289430425738003700</id><published>2009-03-28T11:54:00.001-06:00</published><updated>2009-03-28T12:29:22.546-06:00</updated><title type='text'>Why I will choose to be rationally ignorant</title><summary type='text'>Often in our class discussions, we discuss how politicians often change what they say in order to appeal to their audiences. We have discussed how candidates often target the median voter. In the democratic primaries, a candidate would target the medium left voter. In the national election, the candidate would target the medium voter, trying to encompass right and left side voters. Since we, and </summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://economics-government.blogspot.com/feeds/289430425738003700/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=15268980&amp;postID=289430425738003700' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/15268980/posts/default/289430425738003700'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/15268980/posts/default/289430425738003700'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://economics-government.blogspot.com/2009/03/why-i-will-choose-to-be-rationally.html' title='Why I will choose to be rationally ignorant'/><author><name>Russell Harward</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-15268980.post-1013702428347558846</id><published>2009-03-25T10:01:00.002-06:00</published><updated>2009-03-25T10:32:06.384-06:00</updated><title type='text'>Current Mindset</title><summary type='text'>My daughter started kindergarten this year and as I wanted the best option for her, I spent a lot of  time visiting schools and classrooms last spring.  I finally settled on a charter school for her and went about the enrollment process.  In order for her to attend,  I would need to pay tuition for her first year and since I didn't have the money, I went in search of a scholarship for her (yes, </summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://economics-government.blogspot.com/feeds/1013702428347558846/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=15268980&amp;postID=1013702428347558846' title='2 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/15268980/posts/default/1013702428347558846'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/15268980/posts/default/1013702428347558846'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://economics-government.blogspot.com/2009/03/current-mindset.html' title='Current Mindset'/><author><name>Annette Mullen</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>2</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-15268980.post-5379900707811365402</id><published>2009-03-09T22:57:00.032-06:00</published><updated>2009-04-30T18:53:10.176-06:00</updated><title type='text'>Values or Incentives?</title><summary type='text'>Is accountability the right word in describing those that make decisions? Does it really matter if values aren't really the main focus? Kaplan, to me, has described an emotional basis for people's reasoning behind their beliefs. It seems this author has described American citizens as either rationally irrational or rationally ignorant voters because of their convictions-- convictions of what they</summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://economics-government.blogspot.com/feeds/5379900707811365402/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=15268980&amp;postID=5379900707811365402' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/15268980/posts/default/5379900707811365402'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/15268980/posts/default/5379900707811365402'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://economics-government.blogspot.com/2009/03/values-or-incentives.html' title='Values or Incentives?'/><author><name>NOT TODAY</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='32' height='24' src='http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-mrA62NEAWQk/Tqy-ybp350I/AAAAAAAAADU/ugktNZGPF2s/s220/DSC00524.JPG'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-15268980.post-9040850177439190475</id><published>2009-03-01T21:53:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2009-03-01T21:54:07.383-07:00</updated><title type='text'>Economy in worst shape!</title><summary type='text'>In every newspaper today, I noticed it cover housing market stabilize or how our economy will be. The Federal Reserve predicted that on last November the unemployment rate for jobless would rise to between 7.1 and 7.6 percent. But now the Fed’s estimates that ‘unemployment rate will climb to between 8.5 and 8.8 percent,’ Even though The President have signed the $787 billion stimulus package. I </summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://economics-government.blogspot.com/feeds/9040850177439190475/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=15268980&amp;postID=9040850177439190475' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/15268980/posts/default/9040850177439190475'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/15268980/posts/default/9040850177439190475'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://economics-government.blogspot.com/2009/03/economy-in-worst-shape.html' title='Economy in worst shape!'/><author><name>halina truong</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-15268980.post-1458686518182159331</id><published>2009-03-01T17:16:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2009-03-01T17:17:25.204-07:00</updated><title type='text'>Doesn't Matter What Party You Are</title><summary type='text'>Since the government isn't under the restraint of a business( i.e. risks, demand/ supply), it's hard to imagine how resources are used and what output is produced.The NY Times article, "Liberal Groups Are Flexing New Muscle in Lobby Wars", writes about the collaborative teamwork of liberal lobbyists,Giant,and Exelon power company.Deluded as this sounds, a large, mid- atlantic, supermarket chain </summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://economics-government.blogspot.com/feeds/1458686518182159331/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=15268980&amp;postID=1458686518182159331' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/15268980/posts/default/1458686518182159331'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/15268980/posts/default/1458686518182159331'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://economics-government.blogspot.com/2009/03/doesnt-matter-what-party-you-are.html' title='Doesn&apos;t Matter What Party You Are'/><author><name>NOT TODAY</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='32' height='24' src='http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-mrA62NEAWQk/Tqy-ybp350I/AAAAAAAAADU/ugktNZGPF2s/s220/DSC00524.JPG'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-15268980.post-1542649609370705251</id><published>2009-02-28T21:57:00.002-07:00</published><updated>2009-02-28T22:08:41.939-07:00</updated><title type='text'>The Decline of Democracy</title><summary type='text'>I have always been of the opinion that democracy is like “two wolves and a sheep deciding on what to have for dinner,” for a democratic system has the potential to rapidly chip away at the freedoms and liberties of the individual as the wants and needs of the many gain greater power. Churchill perfectly captured my sentiments when he stated, “it has been said that democracy is the worst form of </summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://economics-government.blogspot.com/feeds/1542649609370705251/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=15268980&amp;postID=1542649609370705251' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/15268980/posts/default/1542649609370705251'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/15268980/posts/default/1542649609370705251'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://economics-government.blogspot.com/2009/02/decline-of-democracy.html' title='The Decline of Democracy'/><author><name>Shay Callahan</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-15268980.post-5841125544371271538</id><published>2009-02-28T20:45:00.005-07:00</published><updated>2009-02-28T21:16:01.531-07:00</updated><title type='text'>self-interest vs. proper role for government</title><summary type='text'>Currently, there is no shortage of topics of conversation in the realm of economics. It seems as though almost every person I talk to makes reference to the current state of the economy, the stimulus bill,  the housing market, or some other dire sounding issue. I find it amusing to see how the same people who ask me what exactly economics is as soon as they find out that it is my major are often </summary><link rel='related' href='http://hr.cch.com/news/employment/022709a.asp' title='self-interest vs. proper role for government'/><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://economics-government.blogspot.com/feeds/5841125544371271538/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=15268980&amp;postID=5841125544371271538' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/15268980/posts/default/5841125544371271538'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/15268980/posts/default/5841125544371271538'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://economics-government.blogspot.com/2009/02/self-interest-vs-proper-role-for.html' title='self-interest vs. proper role for government'/><author><name>Benjamin Massey</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-15268980.post-8376420784927294159</id><published>2009-02-28T12:25:00.003-07:00</published><updated>2009-02-28T12:28:12.377-07:00</updated><title type='text'>Limiting Liberty</title><summary type='text'>There are so many news stories recently about the President’s 2010 budget. Stocks of healthcare and pharmaceutical companies stocks fell on Thursday after this budget was unveiled.    President Obama wants healthcare providers to bid to provide Medicare Advantage plans in order to reduce the amount of many paid to subsidize these plans.  He also wants to reduce money given to pharmaceutical </summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://economics-government.blogspot.com/feeds/8376420784927294159/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=15268980&amp;postID=8376420784927294159' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/15268980/posts/default/8376420784927294159'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/15268980/posts/default/8376420784927294159'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://economics-government.blogspot.com/2009/02/limiting-liberty.html' title='Limiting Liberty'/><author><name>Mary Haggen</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-15268980.post-1300395834573096603</id><published>2009-02-25T09:43:00.004-07:00</published><updated>2009-02-25T10:14:15.187-07:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Same-Sex Rights'/><title type='text'>Same Sex Rights - A Separation of Church and State</title><summary type='text'>The battle for same-sex rights is a major topic of discussion in some states. I'm still on the fence regarding same-sex benefits, yet I'd like to discuss certain freedoms and rights that need to provided to same-sex partners. This would include transfer of private property, designation as beneficiaries and guardians in the event of medical emergency or death. These rights should be an individual </summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://economics-government.blogspot.com/feeds/1300395834573096603/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=15268980&amp;postID=1300395834573096603' title='1 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/15268980/posts/default/1300395834573096603'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/15268980/posts/default/1300395834573096603'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://economics-government.blogspot.com/2009/02/same-sex-rights-separation-of-church.html' title='Same Sex Rights - A Separation of Church and State'/><author><name>Chris Peacock</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>1</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-15268980.post-4103330737810297334</id><published>2009-02-22T16:05:00.001-07:00</published><updated>2009-02-22T16:06:52.399-07:00</updated><title type='text'>Cutting the deficit</title><summary type='text'>After clicking on the news link on the Google homepage, I found an article mentioning that President Obama wants to cut the budget deficit in half by the end of his term in 2013. The goal is to cut the current deficit of $1.3 trillion to $533 billion. I found this to be an interesting statement when considering the actions that have already been taken under Obama’s presidency. Thus far, the </summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://economics-government.blogspot.com/feeds/4103330737810297334/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=15268980&amp;postID=4103330737810297334' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/15268980/posts/default/4103330737810297334'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/15268980/posts/default/4103330737810297334'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://economics-government.blogspot.com/2009/02/cutting-deficit.html' title='Cutting the deficit'/><author><name>Russell Harward</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-15268980.post-136096577780631815</id><published>2008-12-20T14:30:00.003-07:00</published><updated>2008-12-20T14:36:59.843-07:00</updated><title type='text'>President vs. the Economy</title><summary type='text'>All these newspaper stories and television news items that relate to economy always seem to relate to the president.  Everyone wants to know what the president is going to do to fix the economy.  I do not believe that the president is the one who needs to fix anything.  There is only one thing the president can do to fix the economy, and that is tax.  The president maybe able to push policy and </summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://economics-government.blogspot.com/feeds/136096577780631815/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=15268980&amp;postID=136096577780631815' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/15268980/posts/default/136096577780631815'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/15268980/posts/default/136096577780631815'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://economics-government.blogspot.com/2008/12/president-vs-economy.html' title='President vs. the Economy'/><author><name>Blake Leonard</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-15268980.post-6600488211272335504</id><published>2008-12-20T14:19:00.003-07:00</published><updated>2008-12-20T14:27:08.674-07:00</updated><title type='text'>Economists declare: Water is Wet!</title><summary type='text'>There has been so much in the news recently about all these economic downturns.  It is also plainly evident in these others blogs.  And now that I am reaching the end of my college career, people seem to be asking me about my opinion of the market and where things are going.  But just recently, we have made it official that we are in a recession.  Hearing this seemed funny to me.  It as been felt</summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://economics-government.blogspot.com/feeds/6600488211272335504/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=15268980&amp;postID=6600488211272335504' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/15268980/posts/default/6600488211272335504'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/15268980/posts/default/6600488211272335504'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://economics-government.blogspot.com/2008/12/economists-declare-water-is-wet.html' title='Economists declare: Water is Wet!'/><author><name>Blake Leonard</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-15268980.post-1392723118233628554</id><published>2008-12-18T11:19:00.003-07:00</published><updated>2008-12-18T11:35:26.429-07:00</updated><title type='text'>Labor Unions Are Market Failure</title><summary type='text'>Reading this story about card-check, I'm struck by the idea that this is a rare example of how unions might hurt the individuals they represent.  I disagree because labor unions are a source of market failure. Their purpose is to create a monopoly of labor, and in a monopoly, prices are higher than they should be for a perfectly competitive market. A corrective government should fix monopolies by</summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://economics-government.blogspot.com/feeds/1392723118233628554/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=15268980&amp;postID=1392723118233628554' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/15268980/posts/default/1392723118233628554'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/15268980/posts/default/1392723118233628554'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://economics-government.blogspot.com/2008/12/labor-unions-are-market-failure.html' title='Labor Unions Are Market Failure'/><author><name>Michelle Rennolet</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-15268980.post-7820652007603607113</id><published>2008-12-18T10:09:00.006-07:00</published><updated>2008-12-18T10:53:49.584-07:00</updated><title type='text'>Obligitory Bailout Post</title><summary type='text'>I find most talks of a bailout by government to be almost physically painful, so I try to avoid listening to them, but that is almost impossible. It seems that I've heard every argument as to the effectiveness of an auto bailout, but it's been a while since I've heard one that actually makes sense to me.A subsidy should be used in the case of a positive externality, but we are not dealing with a </summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://economics-government.blogspot.com/feeds/7820652007603607113/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=15268980&amp;postID=7820652007603607113' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/15268980/posts/default/7820652007603607113'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/15268980/posts/default/7820652007603607113'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://economics-government.blogspot.com/2008/12/i-find-most-talks-of-bailout-by.html' title='Obligitory Bailout Post'/><author><name>Michelle Rennolet</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-15268980.post-2503211843394468933</id><published>2008-12-15T23:36:00.003-07:00</published><updated>2008-12-16T00:36:48.977-07:00</updated><title type='text'>After rate cuts: The Fed's new ball game</title><summary type='text'>Since September of 2007, the Fed has been cutting the interest rates. At the moment there have been 4.25% points of cuts since September. However, none of this has done anything to help stimulate the economy, and things have only gotten worse.  Economists are expecting the Fed to cut the rate again, which it is unknown whether this will help the economy or not, but it will put the interest rate </summary><link rel='related' href='http://money.cnn.com/2008/12/15/news/economy/credit_market/index.htm' title='After rate cuts: The Fed&apos;s new ball game'/><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://economics-government.blogspot.com/feeds/2503211843394468933/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=15268980&amp;postID=2503211843394468933' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/15268980/posts/default/2503211843394468933'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/15268980/posts/default/2503211843394468933'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://economics-government.blogspot.com/2008/12/after-rate-cuts-feds-new-ball-game.html' title='After rate cuts: The Fed&apos;s new ball game'/><author><name>Brandon Freitag</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-15268980.post-6470593007842756032</id><published>2008-12-04T01:24:00.002-07:00</published><updated>2008-12-04T01:40:03.340-07:00</updated><title type='text'>Rising costs could push college out of reach</title><summary type='text'>Something that I'm sure most of us might be concerned with is the cost of college. As the economy continues to struggle, and money becomes even more troublesome to come by, college tuition is continuing to rise. It's no surprise to me that we only have 34% of young Americans in college compared to some of the other countries. It really does show, at least in my opinion. If we want to remain the </summary><link rel='related' href='http://www.cnn.com/2008/LIVING/personal/12/03/college.costs/index.html?iref=werecommend' title='Rising costs could push college out of reach'/><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://economics-government.blogspot.com/feeds/6470593007842756032/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=15268980&amp;postID=6470593007842756032' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/15268980/posts/default/6470593007842756032'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/15268980/posts/default/6470593007842756032'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://economics-government.blogspot.com/2008/12/rising-costs-could-push-college-out-of.html' title='Rising costs could push college out of reach'/><author><name>Brandon Freitag</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-15268980.post-4941257605515783969</id><published>2008-12-02T12:46:00.002-07:00</published><updated>2008-12-02T12:57:48.568-07:00</updated><title type='text'>Recession</title><summary type='text'>Well it's finally official, the U.S. is in a recession...Starting last year in December, which was the peak of recent economic activity, the U.S. economy has been declining.  With now more than 1.2 million jobs that have been cut it's easy to see the effects.  Even with all the money from bailouts and what not it looks like we'll be in trouble for awhile.  People aren't spending as much as needed</summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://economics-government.blogspot.com/feeds/4941257605515783969/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=15268980&amp;postID=4941257605515783969' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/15268980/posts/default/4941257605515783969'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/15268980/posts/default/4941257605515783969'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://economics-government.blogspot.com/2008/12/recession.html' title='Recession'/><author><name>Peter Brachhold</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-15268980.post-8966048715509526850</id><published>2008-11-30T22:46:00.001-07:00</published><updated>2008-11-30T22:48:33.989-07:00</updated><title type='text'>Tax</title><summary type='text'>Obama simply wants to return the county to the tax structure that we had under Clinton. Back then the economy was in prosperous and surpluses instead of debt.  As many people know that Obama’s tax policy gives away more money than will be generated by this massive tax increase. This is also a big increase on business owner to either pass along those tax increases to consumers in the form of </summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://economics-government.blogspot.com/feeds/8966048715509526850/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=15268980&amp;postID=8966048715509526850' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/15268980/posts/default/8966048715509526850'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/15268980/posts/default/8966048715509526850'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://economics-government.blogspot.com/2008/11/tax.html' title='Tax'/><author><name>halina truong</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-15268980.post-3872538873518781869</id><published>2008-11-30T21:17:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2008-11-30T21:19:26.823-07:00</updated><title type='text'>First Hand Intervention</title><summary type='text'>Thomas Paine wrote about intervention:“Society in every state is a blessing, but Government, even at its best state, is but a necessary evil; in its worst state an intolerable one: for when we suffer, or are exposed to the same miseries by a Government, which we might expect in a country without Government, our calamity is heightened by reflecting that we furnish the means by reflecting that we </summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://economics-government.blogspot.com/feeds/3872538873518781869/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=15268980&amp;postID=3872538873518781869' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/15268980/posts/default/3872538873518781869'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/15268980/posts/default/3872538873518781869'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://economics-government.blogspot.com/2008/11/first-hand-intervention.html' title='First Hand Intervention'/><author><name>Brandon Weber</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry></feed>
